Avoid-inate
May. 1st, 2006 03:49 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Intersting things you find out while reading The Times at lunchtime..
1. Jack Davenport from This Life is married to Michelle Gomez, the insane Scottish one from Green Wing!!
2. The government is thinking of taxing private use for email and web made of computers at work by taxpayers (thinks: how the fuck are they going to enforce that one without imposing blanket monitorig requirements on employers in breachof ECHR rights of privacy??)
3. The finals of a major surfing competition are being held in.. Thurso!!!
spikeiowa wins!!
4. Also, a really funny Dr Who review (Actually Google makes it pretty clear CM is a huge DT fan. Not any relation to Dylan, I suppose?)
1. Jack Davenport from This Life is married to Michelle Gomez, the insane Scottish one from Green Wing!!
2. The government is thinking of taxing private use for email and web made of computers at work by taxpayers (thinks: how the fuck are they going to enforce that one without imposing blanket monitorig requirements on employers in breachof ECHR rights of privacy??)
3. The finals of a major surfing competition are being held in.. Thurso!!!
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
4. Also, a really funny Dr Who review (Actually Google makes it pretty clear CM is a huge DT fan. Not any relation to Dylan, I suppose?)
no subject
Date: 2006-05-01 03:05 pm (UTC)Because it's usually the latter that The Times reports as "EU about to tell you how long your arms can be."
no subject
Date: 2006-05-01 03:09 pm (UTC)I never read the Times so I wouldn't know! It was all that was left in cafe Nero!
no subject
Date: 2006-05-01 03:13 pm (UTC)It's because they're giving some kind of new tax relief replacing the Home Computer Initiative. I remeber hearing complaints on the radio post the Budget so they've obviously cobbled this together damn quick.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-01 03:26 pm (UTC)So not "You'll have to pay 5p every time you send an email", which is what I originally misunderstood it as...
no subject
Date: 2006-05-01 03:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-01 03:54 pm (UTC)Of course, any medium/large sized organisation already does that, for fear of employees spending all day surfing the web...
no subject
Date: 2006-05-01 03:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-01 04:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-02 04:07 pm (UTC)